| Home > Craftsman Clubs > BBS > Woodworking Tips > Might need help folks :) |
|
| Woodworking Tips Moderated by root |
Post Reply | Post New Message Login | Join Craftsman Club | Return to Thread List |
| Not Logged in. | |
| View: [Flat] Tree | Font: [Small] Large | Pages: [1] | |
| Author | Subject/Content |
| Joe | December 9th, 2004 12:48 PM I may come into an old Sears Scroll and Table Saw. Supposedly "old", but should be in decent shape. I'm told the scroll saw is a "512" prefix, which, I've never heard of, and that the table saw has some rust and is beat up. I hope it is still OK. Was in the house when these folks got there. May need some help from the group, as I'm green (no pun intended) on woodworking tools. I'll post back if I wind up getting them.....The big issue is that I don't own a ppickup or SUV to grab them and have to rely on a friend for getting down there with his ttruck OR hope they fit in my Cavalier or Saturn sedan with fold down seats. The scroll saw shouldn't be an issue, but the table saw might be :). Thanks, Joe |
| Ren | December 13th, 2004 09:45 PM Well, I just checked the Sears Model Number chart at www.owwm.com/Craftsman and they didn't list prefix 512 either. I know my '80s era Craftsman Scrollsaw was built by Dremel. |
| Joe | December 14th, 2004 08:07 AM I got the saw, but it was incomplete :(. The table saw wound up being a 1979 (based on dates stamped on a part) Emerson made direct drive saw, but it's missing the motor and such. I will sell it for parts or trade someone that needs it for something else I may need (see other post). Yes, Dremel made for Sears. But they had a 572 prefix, not 512. I'll bet that's what she meant. When I got there, the scroll saw was gone :(. |
| Ren | December 14th, 2004 08:49 PM Yeah, a neat "gimmick" with my Sears scrollsaw is the PTO (Power Take-Off) on the motor shaft. It allows a 4" sanding disk to be attached or a flexible shaft that has a 1/8" collect for rotary tool accessories. But it is not a very powerful scrollsaw, and the pin blades are the shorter length (3.5"?). |
| Joe | December 16th, 2004 07:58 AM Ren: Hopefully, I will continue to come into these oldies like this :). |
| View: [Flat] Tree | Font: [Small] Large | Pages: [1] | |
| Post Reply | Post New Message |
